ENT Health

Expert Ear, Nose and Throat News – Now!

Showing posts with label mouth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mouth. Show all posts

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Uvula Piercing

No comments

It happens, but thankfully rare...

Ear piercing I will do, but truly uvula piercing is not something I would recommend given a whole host of problems it may cause including:

• Gagging
• Snoring
• Airway obstruction
• Uvular stretching
• Uvular bisection
• Accidental inhalation if it comes loose
• Uvular swelling
etc. etc. etc.

Indeed, most people would rather get their uvula removed rather than "enhancing" it!

Monday, December 10, 2012

Coffee Reduces Risk of Death from Oral Cancer

No comments


In a prior blog, I mentioned that researchers found that regular coffee drinkers who drank more than four cups of coffee a day had a 39 percent decreased risk of two types of head and neck cancer: oral cavity and pharynx cancers. In the study published in the Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, they found however, that coffee did not decrease the risk of laryngeal cancer. Read a CNN report on this here.

In a more recent study (Dec 2012), researchers have found that not only does coffee reduce risk of cancer, but that consuming more than four cups of caffeinated coffee per day was associated with a 49 percent lower risk of oral/pharyngeal cancer death relative to no/occasional coffee intake.

Coffee contains over 1,000 different chemical compounds, including cancer-fighting antioxidants, and it’s those antioxidants that may provide a “plausible explanation” for reducing the cancer risk as well as cancer death.

However, patients should not take this study as an excuse to increase their coffee intake specifically to counteract known cancer-causing behaviors including smoking, drinking alcohol, and chewing tobacco.

Reference:
Coffee and Tea Intake and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jul;19(7):1723-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0191. Epub 2010 Jun 22.

Coffee, Tea, and Fatal Oral/Pharyngeal Cancer in a Large Prospective US Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2012 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws222

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

"Mother's Kiss" to Remove Nasal Foreign Bodies

No comments

In 1965, a general practitioner Vladimir Ctibor described the "Mother's Kiss" technique of removing nasal foreign bodies in a child.

Essentially, a trusted adult (like a mother) places her mouth over the child's mouth as if to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. While pinching off the unaffected nostril, the adult than blows gently into the child's mouth until resistance is felt caused by the child closing the glottis. At that moment, the adult gives a sharp explosive exhalation to deliver a strong puff of air that passes up into the nose and out the unblocked nostril. If successful, this air puff will also blow the foreign body out the nose as well.

If the adult blow's air when the child's glottis is open, air will just go into the lungs rather than up the nose.

Prior to the procedure, the child is informed that the mom will give the child a "big kiss," hence the name of this procedure.

Now... does this technique actually work?

According to one meta-analysis, it works about 59.9% of the time.

The way I consider it... it can't hurt to try before using instruments to manually remove the nasal foreign body. A "mother's kiss" is certainly a more comfortable and familiar approach for a child versus the alternative.

However, one warning point... the child should be calmly breathing during this procedure. If the child becomes hysterical during the procedure, the child might strongly inhale through the unblocked nostril and potentially suck the foreign body (if small enough) down into the lungs making an unlucky situation into a medical emergency.

Another point for those uninformed... do NOT use this procedure on ear foreign bodies. It will NOT work. The ear canal is a closed container with no inlet or outlet for any air pressure produced by a "Mother's Kiss." In fact, trying to perform this procedure on the ear may cause a ruptured eardrum and even permanent hearing loss.


Reference:
Removal of Foreign Bodies from the Nose. NEJM 1985; 312:725.

Efficacy and safety of of the "Mother's Kiss" technique: A systematic review of case reports and case series. CMAJ 2012. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.111864 (full length pdf)

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Tongue Tie–And Not the Kind Politicians Have

3 comments
by Dr. Richard Thrasher

Ankyloglossia, or tongue tie, is a very common congenital condition, meaning it’s something with which you’re born. This picture from Dr. Ghorayeb’s site shows a perfect example of a pretty dramatic one.

Ankyloglossia is when the lingual frenulum (the band of tissue under your tongue which tethers it to the floor of your mouth) is either too short or extends too far to the tip of the tongue. It can then prevent normal tongue movement.

While often not signficant, a severe tongue tie can impede breast feeding in newborns. Infants do not breastfeed by using suction, rather the tongue works as pump to mechanically pull milk into the mouth. If the tongue cannot extend past the alveolar ridge (gum line) it makes it difficult to breast feed. This is the one urgent reason for a fix of this condition. Later on, ankyloglossia can affect how far the tongue can protrude from the mouth making things like licking an ice cream cone more difficult.

Another effect of severe tongue tie is on articulation of speech. To see how this can effect someone’s ability to enunciate words, try putting the tip of the tongue against the top of the lower teeth and holding it there while saying the alphabet. Not so easy to do, but possible.

There are many methods for freeing the tongue. The simplest is to simply cut the frenulum in infancy. Snipping the frenulum with Castro-Viejo scissors is my preferred method. If done before a newborn is 6 weeks old, it can be done in the office without local anesthesia. Some parents are quite concerned about what their baby will experience, but as long as they are less than 6 weeks, the frenulum does not have any significant blood supply and no significant nerve supply so it’s not dissimilar to cutting finger nails. Babies don’t like it, but you know it’s not a painful experience. Typically babies will cry for about 10-30 seconds if at all and there’s usually 1-2 drops of blood. I prefer to take kids older than 6 weeks to the OR, unless they are much older in which case we can numb the frenulum in the clinic similar to what’s done for dental work. Some doctors do this for all patients. I find that the numbing shot hurts more than the actual release in the newborns, however.

Another method involves removing the entire frenulum. Sometimes lasers are used for either method. I don’t use lasers because it provides no better result than scissors, takes longer, and there is a slightly higher risk of complications. Sometimes, we use advanced plastic surgery techniques in older children or kids who have had a recurrence of the frenulum after a release. This more often requires a trip to the OR, but in coooperative patients can be done in the clinic under local anesthetic.

Two main complications are possible with this procedure. First, as mentioned above, is re-tethering of the tongue. A scar band can form and replace the frenulum causing the same symptoms. Often the scar band is thicker than the original frenulum and requires more advanced techniques to resolve. The other risk is to the salivary gland ducts that have their openings at the base of the frenulum. Many young kids become aware of these ducts because they are responsible for the ability to “gleek”. If you’re not familiar with this term, present long before fans of the show, Glee, were around, you can watch a video about how to do it, but I have to warn you that for some it may not be something they want to watch. If these ducts are damaged from the procedure, pain, swelling, and infection can occur in the salivary glands beneath your jaw bone (submandibular glands). This can become a significant problem even requiring removal of the gland(s). Fortunately, this is extremely rare and I’ve never seen a case of it caused by this procedure.

If you’re concerned about the possibility of ankyloglossia, have it evaluated. It’s a fairly straight forward problem which is easy to identify and quite easy to fix in most cases.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Celebrity Chef Grant Achatz With Stage 4 Tongue Cancer

No comments
Chicago news recently published a story about their very own celebrity chef Grant Achatz who suffered from Stage 4B squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Grant Achatz, chef and co-owner of Alinea/Next/Aviary, approached multiple physicians throughout the country who essentially told him the oral cancer was terminal. In the end, he underwent treatment at University of Chicago successfully, though he certainly is not out of the woods yet.

There are several approaches in the treatment of tongue cancer, especially one as advanced as Mr. Achatz's, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

In one approach is surgery first to remove all visible disease followed by radiation and chemotherapy to get rid of microscopic tumor cells. Surgery is huge... it entails removal of most of the tongue, involved jawbone, and removal of lymph nodes in the neck (neck dissection). Given how much tissue is removed, reconstruction of the defect is typically performed using bone, skin, and muscle typically taken from the arm (radial forearm free flap). Given how massive the surgery is, a tracheostomy as well as stomach feeding tube is placed. Hospitalization is typically 1-2 weeks long.

An alternative approach is surgery second. Radiation and chemotherapy is done first to shrink the tumor. Once this course is completed, surgery is performed to remove residual disease. The amount of surgery depends on the degree of residual cancer that is left. This course of action is what Mr. Achatz chose to pursue.

Regardless of what step is pursued, there are lots of side effects from cancer treatment including:
  • loss/alteration in taste and smell
  • dry mouth
  • difficulty with swallowing
  • stiff neck
  • poor teeth (often they get removed prior to cancer treatment)
  • leathery skin
Unfortunately, cancer being cancer, risk of recurrence is VERY high especially for stage 4 tongue cancer no matter how well the initial response appears to be. Regularly monitoring over the next 5 years is absolutely essential starting with an exam every 2-3 months for the first two years as that's when the risk of cancer recurrence is highest.

Source:

Tongue Taste Map is a LIE!

No comments
As children, we all learned about the 4 different taste qualities the human tongue can appreciate: salty, sugar, bitter, and sour. Savory or umami was added in 1985. "Calcium" has been proposed in 2008 as well as more recently, "fatty" taste.

Along with the 5 (and possibly more) taste qualities we all had to memorize at some point, we also had to memorize the taste map of the tongue (yes... I know umami is missing):

Well... what a waste of time to memorize the tongue taste map because it is wrong!!! This tongue taste map was originally sketched by Edwin Boring in 1942 and has since been frequently reproduced in textbooks, wine classes, and biology courses.

The tongue taste map delineates specific areas where certain taste qualities are perceived better than in other areas like the state of Texas is distinctly a different region than Montana.

However, reality is a mish-mash patchwork spread unevenly throughout the tongue that is different for each person.

Each of the ~5000 taste buds found on the surface of the tongue contain clusters of over 100 taste cells with receptors that have different degrees of sensitivity to molecules carrying MORE than one basic taste and that these clusters are distributed across the entire surface of the tongue.

Bottom line?

Tongue taste map is a lie.


Reference:
The cell biology of taste. JCB vol. 190 no. 3 285-296, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201003144


A Map of Taste. NYT 3/19/12

Oral Mass Excised From Fetus Still in the Womb!

No comments
In a world's first, surgeons removed a 4 cm oral mass (teratoma) in a 4 month old fetus while still in the womb. This was performed at the University of Miami Hospital.

A cannula was inserted through the mother's belly and into the womb where it was directed to the mass under ultrasound and endoscopic guidance. Via this cannula, a laser was used to lop the mass off free.

A healthy baby was born 5 months later and is now a healthy, normal 20 month old child.

A more common variation of this procedure is what is known as an exit procedure. In an exit procedure, a cesarean section is performed and while the newborn is still connected via umbilical cord, all necessary procedures are performed before the cord is cut.

Needless to say, performing surgery while still in the womb is an amazing feat of medical science and technology. 

Kudos to the surgery team and the mother!!!

Reference:
Successful in utero treatment of an oral teratoma via operative fetoscopy: case report and review of the literature. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Volume 207, Issue 1 , Pages e12-e15, July 2012
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 

Other Topics on ENT Health

Corner left
Corner right
Powered by Blogger